Lacson to US lawmakers opposing anti-terror law: ‘Shut up, hypocrites’

Saturday, July 18th, 2020. Filed under: Legal Matters News Philippine News U.S. News

MANILA, July 18 (Mabuhay) — Senator Panfilo Lacson on Friday questioned the moral ascendancy of some US Congress members to oppose and criticize the Philippines’ anti-terror law.

“I wonder how many among those 50 or so members of the US Congress voted in favor of their own country’s Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001… These US Congress members should shut up unless they admit to being a bunch of hypocrites,” Lacson, principal sponsor of the recently-signed law, said in a statement.

“While our Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020 is replete with safeguards to ensure that human rights of suspected terrorists are observed and protected, what the US Congress passed as their version of an Anti-Terrorism law is much stronger, even cruel to some extent,” he added.

Lacson claimed that the anti-terror law of the Philippines does not have a provision for a “Guantánamo Bay-like detention facility” where suspected terrorists are indefintiely detained without trial and where torture and violations of human rights have been reported by Amnesty International.

He added that the measure does not allow the “one-party consent” to conduct electronic or technical surveillance.

At least 45 US lawmakers urged the Philippine government to repeal the anti-terror law which President Rodrigo Duterte signed earlier this month.

In response, Malacañang insisted that the country is no longer an American colony and that it has its own working judicial system to rule on the constitutionality of the law.

Several groups immediately challenged the legality of the measure before the Supreme Court for fears that it could be used to stifle activism and promote more human rights abuses.

Among the controversial provisions of the Anti-Terrorism Act that have been pointed out by critics were the extension of the 36-hour detention period for those arrested without warrant to up to 24 days; the court’s issuance of a preliminary proscription order against suspected terrorists within 72 hours; and the allegedly “ambiguous” definition of what constitutes terrorism. (MNS)

ALSO READ: US lawmakers urge Philippine gov’t to repeal anti-terror law

Related posts

Supreme Court to hold oral arguments on anti-terror lawDOJ says persons, groups wrongly tagged as terrorists can turn to courtsDOJ completes IRR of anti-terror law124 terrorists killed in 1st half of 2020 — ArmyUS lawmakers urge Philippine gov’t to repeal anti-terror lawSolons to make recommendations in IRR for new anti-terror law — BiazonAnti-Terror Council to start crafting IRRDuterte signs anti-terror bill into lawDuterte ‘inclined’ to sign anti-terror bill into law — PH PalaceLacson reminds Catriona: Australia implements more stringent anti-terrorism lawAFP chief’s proposal to regulate social media illegal and unconstitutional — DrilonDuterte tells communists: You have 2 choicesDuterte to release political prisoners if Congress passes amnesty lawWhy Duterte offered Cabinet posts to RedsLopez, veteran immigration lawyer, dies in car accidentWar games held as China flexes musclesPalace affirms military assessment on presence of ISIS in PHLPHL welcomes more US forces to ‘counter China’US, Philippines hold talks on boosting military capacity: spokesmanMcCain suggests US ‘losing’ against IS